Articles: Medical Errors
To Sleep the Eternal Sleep
(print
version [pdf])
Susan
Hill (fictitious name) was wheeled up to her postoperative
medical surgical room at 11:30 AM. Mrs. Hill weighed 120
pounds; she was recovering from a hysterectomy. Her postoperative
medications included Demerol (meperidine) 50-100 mg
IM every 3-4 hours PRN (as needed), and Phenergan 12.5 mg
IV every 6 hours PRN for nausea. The nurse assigned to the
patient until 7 PM administered 50 mg of Demerol at
12:30 PM and 100 mg at 2 PM and 5 PM. Phenergan 12.5 mg
was given IM at 12:30 PM, 2 PM and 5 PM. The nurse administered
Phenergan to potentiate the action of Demerol (although
this drug does not potentiate the pain relief of Demerol
and increases the risk of oversedation.) The patient had
no complaints of nausea.
The next nurse came on duty at 7 PM. The
patient began complaining of a headache around 8 PM. Susan’s
concerned mother called her sister, who was a nursing supervisor
at the hospital, but was off duty at the time. The nursing
supervisor suggested that Susan’s mother ask if a
physician could see her daughter, and provide the information
that the patient had reactions to opiates in the past, but
had gotten good pain relief from Toradol. The first-year
resident came up to evaluate the patient at around 8:15
PM. The daughter’s bedside. She provided the history
of reactions to opiates and that Toradol had been effective;
she hoped the doctor would change the Demerol order. The
doctor responded, “I am the doctor. I know what I
am doing.” The resident made no changes in the orders,
except for ordering the Phenergan 12.5 IV to be changed
to Phenergan 25 mg IM every 3-4 hours PRN. This alteration
was made at the request of the nurse because since the patient
did not have an IV; the nurses had been giving Phenergan
IM.
Mrs. Hill received Demerol 100 mg at
8:25 PM and 11:25 PM. Phenergan 25 mg was given along with
it each time. No nausea was present. The patient’s
mother noticed her daughter was becoming increasingly lethargic
and unable to stay awake as the evening continued. Mrs.
Hill was mumbling incoherently around midnight. At 2:25
AM, exactly 3 hours after the last Demerol and Phenergan
injection, and in the absence of any complaints of pain
or nausea, the nurse took a syringe with Demerol and Phenergan
to the patient’s bedside. She noticed the patient
had shallow respirations; a few minutes later Mrs. Hill
stopped breathing. A resuscitation team rushed to the bedside.
Mrs. Hill’s breathing and heart beat were restored;
she was transferred to ICU and placed on a ventilator. Testing
performed a few hours after the arrest revealed the patient
had toxic levels of Demerol in her blood. The healthcare
providers investigated a variety of causes to determine
the origin of the patient’s arrest and reached the
inescapable conclusion that the patient had arrested from
Demerol intoxication. EEGs showed an absence of brain function.
Mrs. Hill was removed from life support four days later.
She was in her 30s when she died. The family’s lawsuit
against the nurses and resident was settled out of court.
LESSONS LEARNED
What lessons can we learn from this young woman’s
death? Tragically, it was the conscientious desire to keep
the patient comfortable that led to the administration of
too much Demerol and Phenergan. The patient’s nurses
testified they wanted to “stay on top” of the
patient’s pain. Unfortunately, this resulted in administering
pain relieving medication to Mrs. Hill when there were no
complaints of pain. A variety of tools are in place to assess
the pain levels of specific populations, such as children,
adults, and the elderly. Many facilities’ staff ask
cognitively intact adults to rate their pain on a scale
from 0-10. Although the form in the patient’s medical
record prompted the nurses to ask the patient to identify
her level of pain, they did not do so. Documentation of
pain levels before administration of pain relievers helps
to substantiate the need for the medication. Documentation
of pain levels verifies the effectiveness of the medication
after its administration. Failure to achieve satisfactory
levels of pain relief should stimulate a change in the plan
of care. Additionally, some nurses are recording the patient’s
perception of what would be satisfactory level of pain,
since it may not be possible to relieve all pain.
Maximum doses of Demerol and Phenergan
were given to Mrs. Hill without regard to her slight frame,
and without her asking for pain medication. The hazards
of Demerol have been identified in recent years. Many acute
care facilities have stopped using Demerol due to the risk
of the accumulation of normeperidine, which is a toxic metabolite
of Demerol excreted through the kidney. In patients with
normal renal function, normeperidine has a half-life of
15 to 20 hours; this time is extended greatly in elderly
individuals and patients with impaired renal function. Normeperidine
can cause a respiratory arrest event in young, otherwise
healthy patients given sufficiently high doses.
Another problem was that the headache
was not recognized as a side effect of the Demerol. Demerol
can also cause confusion, agitation, dizziness, and hallucinations,
especially in the elderly. Symptoms of an overdose include
extreme drowsiness, muscle weakness, confusion, cold and
clammy skin, pinpoint pupils, shallow breathing, slow heart
rate, fainting, or coma. The nurse did not find it concerning
that the patient was unable to carry on a coherent conversation
as the evening wore on.
Mrs. Hill’s slowly declining blood
pressure was not recognized as a sign of oversedation. The
nurse caring for her testified that she was aware of the
vital signs that were recorded by the nursing assistant,
but thought they refl ected a lessening of pain and anxiety
as the Demerol took effect. The culmination of the gaps
in assessment, along with maximum doses of Demerol and Phenergan,
resulted in the patient’s death.
| TAKE
HOME LESSONS
1.
As an opiate/narcotic, Demerol is in the category
of highest risk drugs. Its use to manage postoperative
pain is no longer state of the art. More progressive
facilities have eliminated its use except to treat
shivering.
2. Review the medical record of a patient who has
been potentially oversedated to determine if the nurses
were evaluating the patient’s level of pain
and describing the patient’s level of sedation.
3. Review the record to determine if the frequency
and dose of the opiate was administered as ordered.
4. Review vital signs recorded by ancillary staff.
Look for patterns of changes in vital signs, such
as declining blood pressure before the oversedation
was detected.
5. Review the hospital protocols on the use of Narcan,
a drug that can reverse the effects of opiates. Determine
if it was given in this case.
6. Recognize that these cases are very hard to defend.
7. Contact Med League for experts and screening of
cases. |
References
1. http://www.mosbysdrugconsult.com/WOW/op024.html (no longer
available)
Back
to Medical Errors articles
|