Archive for the ‘Medical malpractice’ Category

Should a Nurse go to Prison for Reporting Concerns about a Physician? by Pat Iyer

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Anne Mitchell RN

Anne Mitchell RN

Two West Texas nurses faced up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000 for reporting concerns about the substandard care of Dr. Rolando Arafiles Jr. How did this happen? Nurse Vicki Galle and Nurse Anne Mitchell were part of the tiny staff of a tiny hospital in a tiny town in West Texas. Winkler County Memorial Hospital has 15 beds, employs 15 registered nurses and 17 licensed practical nurse, and has 7,000-8,000 people in the entire county. Both nurses worked at the hospital for over 20 years. Vicki and Anne reported concerns about Dr. Arafiles to the Texas Medical Board. They, as well as others, were concerned that his practices were inconsistent with the quality of care and patient safety. They were also concerned about his use of non-therapeutic treatments and prescriptions. The two nurses provided medical record numbers to the Board, but no patient names, to support their concerns.

When the physician was notified by the Texas Medical Board that he had been reported to the Board, he filed a complaint with the sheriff (who was one of his patients) alleging that he was being harassed. Sheriff Roberts tracked down the two nurses, who were indicted for misuse of official information and fired. The Texas Medical Board wrote a letter to the District and County Attorneys of Winkler County challenging the notion that the information provided to them was for nongovernmental purposes. They explained that the Board was exempt from HIPAA requirements and is a governmental agency.

Nevertheless, the case proceeded. Nurses throughout the country responded with an outpouring of support and dollars to build up the legal fund for the nurses. Patient advocacy, specifically reporting concerns about a practitioner’s standard of care, is protected under Texas laws and supported by the Nursing Code of Ethics. The case was seen as having the potential to affect the future of patient safety throughout the entire country.

The criminal case against Nurse Galle was dismissed on 2/1/2010, a week before trial was to start. But the case against Nurse Mitchell proceeded. The jury heard details of the cases of substandard care. During cross-examination, Dr. Arafiles struggled to define “standard of care”.

Doctor Rolando Arafiles said he supports the reporting process, but not in this case, because he felt Anne Mitchell was harassing him when she sent an anonymous complaint to the Texas Medical Board. The defense grilled the doctor about medical mistakes he made including one where he injected a needle into the bone of a patient and another where he sent a child with appendicitis home without treatment. The prosecution and defense agreed to nickname the instances on record in which Dr. Arafiles made medical mistakes. Those cases are being called, “Turkey Toe”, “Appendix Boy”, “Rubber Finger Tip”, and “Skin Graft”. “Rubber Finger Tip” references the instance when Dr. Arafiles sewed a part of a suturing kit onto a patient. It was a part of the kit not meant to be used on patients. During testimony, Dr. Arafiles said he meant to use it as a brace and accidentally sewed it to the patient.

During his cross-examination, Dr. Arafiles discussed the nutritional supplement called “Zrii” that he recommended to patients. The doctor admitted that Sheriff Roberts sold Zrii and even held meetings at the local Pizza Hut to recruit others to sell the product. According to the defense, the main ingredient in Zrii is white grape juice and it sells for around $40 a bottle.

At one point Dr. Arafiles was asked whether diabetic patients might have a tendency to heal worse than patients without diabetes. To the dismay of the audience, he said no, that there is no difference. The audience gasped, after which point Hon. Judge James Rex told the audience to keep quiet or else risk being thrown out of the courtroom.

It took the jury less than an hour to return a not guilty verdict on 2/11/2010. The jury foreman said the panel of six men and six women voted unanimously on the first ballot, and questioned why Nurse Mitchell had ever been arrested. “We just did not see the wrongdoing of sending the file numbers in, since she’s a nurse” said the foreman. After the verdict, the nurses’ lawyers quickly turned to the lawsuits they filed in federal court against the county, the hospital, and various officials, charging that the firings and indictments amounted to a violation of due process and their First Amendment rights. Nurse Mitchell’s lawyer said, “We are glad that this phase of this ordeal has ended and that Anne has been restored to her liberty, but there was great damage done in this case, and this does not make them whole.”

President of the American Nurses Association Rebecca Patton called the verdict “a resounding win on behalf of patient safety. The message the jury sent is clear: the freedom for nurses to report a physician’s unsafe medical practices is non-negotiable.”
Sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/us/12nurses.html
http://www.texasnurses.org
cbs7news, Beau Berman

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Navigating the Slippery Legal Slope of Falls by Pat Iyer

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Falls are common causes of suits

Falls are common causes of suits

Inpatient falls and fall-related injuries continue to be the largest category of reported incidents in the acute care setting. Falls occur in many settings: In one week, Med League got four calls about falls: a young brain injured woman who fell off a treadmill at home while under the care of an aide, an elderly woman who fell getting off an examining table in a doctor’s office, a woman who fell in the hospital just before the nurse reached her side, and a man who fell walking out an adult day care setting. The first three cases resulted in lawsuits. The last one has not been filed yet.

About 1,800 fatal falls occur among residents of US nursing homes each year. About 10-20 percent of nursing home falls cause serious injuries. Two to six percent cause fractures. Many patients need to spend at least a year recovering in a long term care facility. Some never return to their homes. In addition to fractures, elderly people suffer soft issue injuries, head trauma, and lacerations.

The 1% of elderly people who fall and sustain a hip fracture have a 20-30% mortality rate within a year of the fracture. One quarter to three quarters of people who lived in the community do not recover their prefracture level of function in ambulation or activities of living. A fall can be life-altering for this group. Fear of falling can lead to reduced mobility, deconditioning, dependency, social isolation, and diminished quality of life. A fall can result in a major disruption to an older person’s life- injury, hospitalization, and rehabilitation.

Falls have many liability issues. Some center around what should have been done to prevent the fall. Hot issues include use of side rails, frequency of monitoring to prevent a fall, responsiveness to the patient’s requests for help, and unsafe equipment such as wheelchairs. A delay in treatment can close a window of opportunity to change the outcome- such as in head injury or spinal cord injury that results from a fall.

Healthcare providers are expected to act as patient advocates to secure help for their patients. A delay in treatment may occur because:

  • The healthcare providers did not collect the appropriate data needed to assess the patient’s condition. The person who fell was not thoroughly assessed and an injury was missed.
  • The appropriate data was collected but the healthcare provider did not have the knowledge to critically analyze the data to find its meaning. The signs of a fracture were overlooked.
  • The data was collected and analyzed, but the appropriate healthcare provider failed to respond to another person’s concerns. The nurse could not get the attention of the physician or the nurse’s concerns were dismissed.
  • The concerns of the bedside clinician were heard, but the provider did not or could not make timely decisions about what to do about the changes in the patient’s condition.

Some facilities have implemented a system of hourly rounds to reduce the factors that result in falls. Think of the four “Ps”:

  • Potty
  • Positioning
  • Pain
  • Possessions- phones, water, glasses, call lights and bedpans within reach.

Join us for a Teleseminar for Attorneys and Legal Nurse Consultants: February 23, 2010 12:00 PM Eastern Time
Navigating the Slippery Legal Slope of Falls

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Why Doctors Should Not Testify to Nursing Standards of Care by Pat Iyer

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Nurses are the appropriate expert witnesses in nursing malpractice cases

Nurses are the appropriate expert witnesses in nursing malpractice cases

The Illinois case called Sullivan V. Edward Hospital, 806 NE 645 (Ill. 2004) involved a man who climbed over side rails and was found on the floor with a head injury. The plaintiff attorney supplied a physician as the liability expert. He was critical of the nursing care by stating the nurse should have restrained the patient. He also testified the nurse “missed the diagnosis of delirium completely.”

Until the early 1980s, it was commonplace for physicians to testify about the nursing standard of care. Although this still occurs in some venues, it is becoming much less common. The status of nursing has changed. Not only do physicians no longer have the special knowledge required to testify in all cases of nursing malpractice, but their use as experts may create problems that could be avoided by using nurses as experts in nursing malpractice cases. Nursing and medicine are two distinct professions albeit with some overlapping functions.

The plaintiff won the Sullivan case; the defense appealed. The Sullivan case was appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court. The Illinois Trial Lawyers supported the position of the plaintiff, and the American Association of Nurse Attorneys also submitted an amicus curiae brief in support of the dense. The Illinois Supreme Court held the plaintiff’s physician expert was not competent to testify about the standard of care of a nurse.

In many venues, affidavits of merit and expert witness reports should be prepared by a person in the same specialty as the defendant. An affidavit signed by a physician who is critical of a nurse could be challenged on the grounds that the physician is not in the same specialty. Even though nurses and physicians closely interact with each other, and have a few areas of overlapping responsibilities, they function in two distinct specialties. Woe be it to the nursing expert who utters anything in a deposition or trial that sounds critical of a doctor. The predictable flow of questions follows:

Q: Nurse, you did not go to medical school, right? You did not complete a residency in (name of specialty), right?

Legal nurse consultants may assist an attorney develop questions to challenge the qualifications of a physician who is offered as a liability expert witness in a nursing malpractice case:

  • Are you eligible to sit for the nursing exam?
  • Are you are a member of any nursing professional association?
  • Have you ever worked as a nurse?
  • Do you have any firsthand knowledge of nursing practice other than for observations made in patient care settings?
  • Do you teach in a school of nursing?
  • Do you hold any nursing certification?
  • Have you written any nursing texts?

A series of “no” answers helps to establish that the archaic practice of allowing physicians to testify about nursing standards of care should be laid to rest.

Part of this post was based on Butler, K. Nursing: Qualifications for Testifying on Standard of Care, Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting, Fall 2004

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Why inexperienced people make mistakes

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

A group of residents eagerly perform complex surgery in the middle of the night while the attending surgeons who are supposed to supervise them are happily sleeping at home. Why is this very real scenario a bad idea? Why do interns, residents, nurses, and others make errors that injure patients? The answer lies in learning theory.

The Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition used by Pat Benner, a nursing theorist, breaks knowledge into two components: “techne” and “phronesis”. Techne knowledge is book knowledge: the information that is captured from procedural or scientific knowledge. The student must be given safe and clear directions on how to proceed, as there is no previous experience on which to draw. For example, a student nurse I supervised discovered her patient was short of breath. She attributed the symptom to anxiety, talked to the patient about her concerns, and held her hand. A more experienced person would have applied oxygen.

The second kind of knowledge is phronesis, which is acquired through learning in the practice setting. A nurse who makes a series of rapid decisions during an emergency draws on phronesis. The rapid response team members in hospitals are made up of experts who use this kind of knowledge.

The evolution of the expert practitioner passes through stages

The evolution of the expert practitioner passes through stages

Benner’s model of expertise, which is based on the Dreyfus model, describes how an individual may pass through five stages in developing expertise. Not everyone reaches the proficient or expert stage.

The novice rigidly adheres to rules or plans, has little situational perception and can’t make judgments. This individual is learning skills in clinical settings and must be closely supervised when delivering patient care.

The advanced beginner is a new graduate. The person functions with limited situational perception (the ability to put clues together to make decisions) and has difficulty discriminating between what is important.

The competent practitioner can see his or her actions within a broader context, and is capable of making sounder judgments. Conscious deliberate planning takes place along with standardized and routine procedures.

The proficient individual sees the situation holistically rather than in terms of its component parts. This individual more readily makes decisions, perceives differences from the normal pattern of a patient, and functions better with ambiguity. The proficient person has learned from experience and has an easier time making decisions.

The expert practitioner no longer relies on rules, guidelines or maxims, and intuitively grasps what is important in a situation. A registered nurse with expert knowledge may well exceed the knowledge of inexperienced physicians and may save a patient’s life by insisting on evaluation, diagnostic testing, change in medication, or another needed course.

A clinically experienced person enters a new healthcare setting as a new employee without knowledge of the politics, procedures, and policies. It takes time to learn “how we do it here.”

And thus we face the dilemma in health care: an inexperienced person will not learn without the opportunity to do so. He or she has to start somewhere. Yet, we don’t want that person to learn on us, our mother or father or child. When my husband had a triple bypass three months ago, the cardiac surgeon at Johns Hopkins proactively told us that he performed surgery. He said he had people in the operating room helping him, but he did the surgery. We were relieved to hear that.

A fair number of medical or nursing malpractice cases that come into Med League involve errors made by inexperienced people, whether they are new employees or new healthcare practitioners. Here are my suggestions:

  1. Attorneys handling medical or nursing malpractice cases should be careful to determine the level of experience of the defendant. Determine the degree of supervision that should have been provided versus what was actually provided.
  2. Ask about the orientation program the new employee should have received. Determine how much orientation staff agency employees received.
  3. Ask the defendant if he or she sought help. Some of us, whether because of age, culture, or personality, would rather try to solve problems without help. This can be a recipe for disaster.
  4. If you or a loved one needs care, seek the most experienced practitioner or hospital you can find.
  5. If you or a loved one detects the person assigned to your care seems unfamiliar with your needs or medical equipment, insist that individual seek help from a more experienced person. Be an advocate for safety.
  6. If you or a loved one needs surgery in a teaching hospital, insist that the attending physician be present. You may even cross off the consent form that allows residents and interns to perform parts of the surgery.

What do you think? How should inexperienced people learn? Send us a comment.

Parts of this blog post came from Moniaree Parker Jones, “Nursing Expertise: A Look at Theory and the LNCC certification Exam”, Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting, Spring 2007. Other parts came from the School of Hard Knocks.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

First Impressions by Pat Iyer

Monday, January 18th, 2010

One of my friends (Sara*) told me she ran into trouble on a substitute teaching job. It seemed the teacher disliked Sara based on her initial impression, and requested that Sara not return to the school. Sara was devastated and showed me a letter she wrote expressing concern about this comment. She asked my advice on what she should do.

negative first impressions sow seeds of discontent

negative first impressions sow seeds of discontent

The expression, “You never get a second chance to make a first impression” applies to all aspects of life. It applies to the patient who approaches the crowded check in desk of the busy emergency department. Is he greeted warmly, or is he seen as an intrusion? Do healthcare providers remember the patient may be scared, in pain, hungry or confused?

Have you had the experience of approaching a receptionist desk in a doctor’s office and having difficulty getting attention? Have you felt like you were an intrusion on the conversations going on behind the desk?

Have you ever felt like a diagnosis instead of a patient? In August 1996, my husband had a colonoscopy that revealed a large colon cancer. He was sent with a requisition form directly to the x-ray department to have a barium enema. The requisition form’s diagnosis stated “colon CA”. I sat next to my stunned husband; we had only a few minutes to absorb the news of his diagnosis. There was a technician responsible for getting him into the waiting area of the radiology department. One of her colleague asked her if she was ready to go to lunch. She called out, “No, I have to do a CA patient now.” I felt like someone had punched me in the stomach as I now realized my husband was branded as a CA patient.

None of these first impressions are cause for a medical malpractice suit but they set up a climate. An opportunity for establishing a caring environment is lost. If any mistake is made that causes harm, there are no credits in the bank- no kindly feelings towards the healthcare provider.

I advised Sara to make two copies of her letter and go to the school to express her concern about what had happened with the teacher. She learned, to her gratitude, that there were many positive comments in her file. She had made positive first impressions on lots of other teachers. What started as a negative experience turned into an opportunity for her to become of aware of how highly others regarded her.

* name changed

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Obtaining Diagnostic Imaging for a Potential Medical Malpractice Claim based on a chapter by Peter Berge JD, MPA, PA

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009
films are crucial in failure to diagnose cases

Films are crucial in failure to diagnose cases

The liability of a failure to diagnose or delay in diagnosis case often rests on the information revealed by a diagnostic test. Both defense and plaintiff attorneys and their experts will be interested in what the test showed. Computerized axial tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are usually stored in digital form. Obtaining those scans on a CD-ROM disk provides significant flexibility, especially when more than one expert will be reviewing the images. Plain radiographs (x-ray films) are becoming more commonly available in digital form. Where diagnostic images can be obtained on disk, they should be. It is more efficient to copy and mail a CD-ROM than to package and send large and ungainly packages of films, much less to send those films from one expert to another. Such files are usually provided with an integrated viewing program, such as those based on the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM [TM]) standard. If not, a number of viewers are available as “freeware” for download from the internet.

Mammograms are most often available only on film, and copies are usually not suitable for expert review due to degradation in image quality. Original mammogram films should be obtained early in the evaluation and handled carefully, as they are often key to claims of delayed diagnosis of breast cancer.

Obtaining diagnostic fetal ultrasound images may present a challenge. Copies are not likely to be of suitable quality for expert review, and providers will sometimes vigorously resist attempts to obtain the original paper images, including opposing motions for pretrial discovery to require their production. It is sometimes possible to obtain digital copies of the original images. Although this can be costly, it is probably less so than engaging in extended motion practice, or paying an expert to go to the potential defendant’s facility to examine the original documents. Cases have been won and lost on the quality and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Be sure to make every effort to safeguard original films. Experts must be instructed on methods of returning films to the appropriate location. Sadly, cases have been won and lost on misplaced films.

Modified from Peter Berge, JD, MPA, PA “Attorney Use of Medical Records in a Medical Malpractice Case”, from Patricia Iyer and Barbara Levin, Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records, Second Edition, March 2010. Contact us for ordering information.

Read more about Med League’s services in medical record analysis.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Illegible Medical Records based on a chapter by Peter Berge JD, MPA, PA

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009
Waht is the name of the drug?

What is the name of the drug?

In 2009, people’s lives still hinge upon correct interpretation of handwritten records. Some handwritten records are virtually, or actually, illegible. The prescription above was written for Femara. Premarin was dispensed and harmed the patient who received it.

Plaintiff’s and defense attorneys and other reviewers should be familiar with state laws or regulations that permit the patient (or her representative) to require the healthcare provider to provide a timely transcription of notes. Defense attorneys are not likely to require transcriptions as they are representing the provider, who (if required) would voluntarily produce them. This can be very helpful in expediting the evaluation of otherwise opaque records in the setting of pretrial investigation. If transcriptions were not obtained during the investigative phase, they should be demanded after suit is filed if there is any doubt as to the interpretation of notations.

Regardless of when transcriptions were created, it is important for plaintiff’s counsel during depositions to verify the accuracy of the transcription. It is surprisingly common to find errors in transcription, especially when it turns out that opposing counsel provided the document without verifying the content with the witness.

Defense counsel will often have the advantage of direct access to defendants for assistance in deciphering medical records, except when dealing with the records of individuals with separate counsel. When in doubt, it is prudent to have the client interpret any handwritten notations of questionable legibility. There will be times, however, when the healthcare provider has no more idea of what the note says than the attorney does. While computerized records have some flaws, they eliminate guessing with people’s lives.

Modified from Peter Berge, JD, MPA,  PA. “Attorney Use of Medical Records in a Medical Malpractice Case”, from Patricia Iyer and Barbara Levin, Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records, Second Edition, 2010.

Contact us for ordering information.

Read more about Med League’s services in medical record analysis.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Specifying the Format of the Medical Records based on a chapter by Peter Berge JD, MPA, PA

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
Medical records on CD- a mixed blessing

Medical records on CD- a mixed blessing

Records are obtained by plaintiff’s counsel prior to filing a medical malpractice suit. Ordering an extract of the medical record (typically containing information such as the admitting history and physical examination, discharge summary and laboratory results) is rarely appropriate in medical malpractice cases. Normally, complete records should be requested.

I was recently asked by a client why I prefer to read paper records over records that have been scanned. The attorney’s perception was that he would save money if he supplied a disk with medical records. He did save money- on the shipping costs. The decision of whether or not to request records in digital format, such as scanned records on CD-ROM (if available), is based in part on the degree of sophistication of the records. Typically, medical records are simply optically scanned and stored in a portable document format (PDF) image file. As such, the reviewer cannot search for text, and must page through each screen to find the desired parts of the chart. If the file is large, and is not numbered and indexed as to content and location, it can be cumbersome to work with and review. Some reviewers find it easier to print out and work with a paper copy, which allows flagging and annotation; this results in a standard paper record. This is particularly true when records are voluminous. Everyone’s definition of voluminous may be slightly different, but to me, voluminous records fill a copy paper box.

Of course, charts scanned on disk require very little storage space (until they are printed), are easily reproduced by copying the disk, and may provide individual files that can be sent by e-mail or transported using a memory stick.

If the scanned records happen to be indexed, allowing the reviewer to jump from section to section (e.g., progress notes to laboratory results, medication records to operative reports), then the digital format is extremely convenient for review. But scanning a batch of unorganized records is often a waste of time. Remember, it is more economical to present the reviewer, whether that person is an expert, a consultant, or an attorney, with information that is organized in a logical way.

Modified from Peter Berge, JD, MPA, PA. “Attorney Use of Medical Records in a Medical Malpractice Case”, from Patricia Iyer and Barbara Levin, Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records, Second Edition, 2010. Contact us for ordering information.

Read more about Med League’s services in medical record analysis.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Reviewing Medical Records in a Potential Medical Malpractice Claim by Peter Berge Esq.

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Analysis of medical records should be done by a knowledgeable person

Analysis of medical records should be done by a knowledgeable person

Once medical records are in hand, someone has to review them. Who should review them, and in what sequence, depends on numerous factors. In the case of a plaintiff’s attorney, if the attorney has a solid knowledge of the medical issues involved in the case, and particularly when the records are not voluminous, it may make sense for the attorney to initially assess the records. If the attorney has managed several similar claims and is well-versed in the subject matter, the initial evaluation may be all that is needed to determine whether to send the records directly to a testifying expert. Defense counsel or risk management personnel presented with a claim would be well-served by familiarizing themselves with the records prior to sending them out to an expert or consultant.

Even when an attorney has in-depth knowledge of the medical and legal issues involved in a claim, the volume of the records in relation to the attorney’s work load may dictate that a legal nurse consultant (LNC) conduct an initial review, organize the records, create a time line and summarize the issues. Likewise, if the attorney is not very knowledgeable about the medicine involved, it is helpful to have an LNC review the material, perform any medical research needed, and provide a report and recommendation to the attorney. Aside from saving the attorney numerous hours in review and research, this approach has the benefit of readying the records for review by a medical expert. With the records already organized and summarized, the expert or experts may be able to review the material more efficiently, providing some savings to the attorney and client.

Modified from Peter Berge, “Attorney Use of Medical Records in a Medical Malpractice Case”, from Patricia Iyer and Barbara Levin, Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records, Second Edition, in press.

The Second Edition of this text will be released in March 2010. Want to save money by buying at the prepublication price? Send an email to ML@medleague.com and in the subject line type “Notify me Medical Records 2 E.”

Read more about Med League’s services in medical record analysis.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?

Which Medical Records are Crucial to Evaluate a Medical Malpractice Claim? by Peter Berge Esq.

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Which medical records do you need to screen a case?

Which medical records do you need to screen a case?

Several factors should be considered by a plaintiff’s attorney when deciding which records to request while evaluating a potential medical malpractice claim. They include the likelihood that the attorney will pursue the case, the volume (and potential cost) of the records and the available resources (whether those of the attorney or the client) to pay the cost, and the nature of the information that will be required to establish the viability of the case. Be aware of any state-specific laws that regulate what the provider may charge to supply a copy of the chart.

When a specific deviation or a particular type of deviation is alleged or suspected, the reviewer must be familiar with the materials that will be needed to thoroughly assess the claim. If a failure to screen for colon cancer is alleged, for instance, the chart of the primary care physician may be sufficient to reveal the deviation and—if it contains reports from the surgeon and oncologist—to assess causation and injury as well. In cases of delayed diagnosis of breast cancer or negligence in interpretation of prenatal ultrasound studies, it is likely that original images of the diagnostic study in question (such as mammography, breast ultrasound or fetal ultrasound) will be required.

When in doubt, the reviewer should consult with the expert who will ultimately be asked to certify or otherwise assess the validity of the claim or the expected testifying expert or experts. The facts of each case will determine whether full certified copies of all records are needed, or whether abstracts may be sufficient. Full certified copies of medical records relating to where the alleged medical malpractice occurred are needed to complete an evaluation of the merits of a claim.

Another factor for plaintiff’s counsel to take into account is whether or not there is a short statute of limitations. When there remains less than six months to investigate a claim, it may be prudent to err on the side of a wider scope of record requests rather than requesting them piecemeal, except when the expected testifying expert is very clear about what would be necessary to provide a definitive opinion as to deviation and causation. A liability expert will have limited need to review voluminous medical records for care rendered after the care alleged to be negligent. A discharge summary may suffice.

A host of records may be relevant in a specific case. Depending on the circumstances of the claim the attorney should examine

• hospital, emergency room, or emergency center records where the injury was initially treated,
• emergency medical services records (ambulance or medical intensive care unit/MICU),
• hospital records that relate to treatment and surgery,
• records of physicians and specialists who examined or treated the plaintiff before and after the incident,
• outpatient imaging (x-rays, MRI scans, CT scans, and so forth),
• any outpatient labs where blood work or other tests (EMG, EKG, and so forth) were done,
• inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation records including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and so forth,
• outpatient pain treatment centers,
• the actual radiographs and reports that relate to the injury,
• the actual pathology specimens and reports that relate to the injury,
• billing records,
• visiting nurse home care records,
• mental health, substance abuse records and HIV records,
• autopsy report, and
• nursing home records.

Modified from Patricia Iyer and Jane Barone, “Obtaining and Organizing Medical Records”, and Peter Berge, “Attorney Use of Medical Records in a Medical Malpractice Case”, from Patricia Iyer and Barbara Levin, Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records, Second Edition, in press
The Second Edition of this text will be released in March 2010. Want to save money by buying at the prepublication price? Send an email to ML@medleague.com and in the subject line type “Notify me Medical Records 2E.”

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon]  What are these?